ANALISIS FAKTOR PENERAPAN MANAJEMEN RANTAI PASOKAN UKM KRIPIK TEMPE MENGGUNAKAN METODE SEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtp.2017.018.03.15Keywords:
Manajemen Rantai Pasokan, Keripik Tempe, UKM Malang, SEMAbstract
ABSTRAK
Usaha Kecil Menengah (UKM) memiliki peran sebagai pendorong perkembangan ekonomi Indonesia. Salah satu UKM di sektor pangan yang berpotensi dalam pemberdayaan ekonomi adalah UKM keripik tempe Sanan, Malang. UKM keripik tempe Sanan dituntut untuk terus berkompetisi untuk mampu bertahan dalam persaingan pasar. Salah satu cara peningkatan kekuatan kompetisi tersebut melalui pengembangan manajemen rantai pasokan. Namun, permasalahan yang sering timbul adalah manajemen rantai pasokan tidak selalu sukses diterapkan pada UKM. Hal tersebut dikarenakan terdapat berbagai faktor yang mempengaruhi manajemen rantai pasokan seperti arusnpasokan, kekuatan dalam pembelian, serta peralatan kerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan antara faktor arus pasokan, peralatan kerja, serta kekuatan pembelian terhadapbpenerapan manajemen rantai pasokan, yang diukur melalui fleksibilitas UKM dalam mengirimkan produk dan tingkat biaya akibat penyimpanan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menyebarkan kuisioner kepada 200 pengelola UKM keripik tempe Sanan dan menganalisa menggunakan metode Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dalam rangka mengoptimalkan kinerja manajemen rantai pasokan, pengelola UKM keripik tempe wajib memberikan perhatian terhadap kelancaran arus pasokan bahan baku demi kelancaran bisnis. Peningkatan arus pasokan mampu diatasi melalui kerjasama yang baik dengan pemasok dan bergabung dengan koperasi usaha keripik tempe Sanan
ABSTRACT
Small Medium Enterprise (SME) gives main contribution to Indonesian’s economic development. Keripik tempe industry in Sanan, Malang is one food industry and one of SME which has to improve its competitivess in order to raise its profit, through the development of Supply Chain Management (SCM). However, the implementation of SCM in SME has many difficulties such as the material supply, buying power, and equipments. The research aims is analysing relationship between variable of material supply, buying power, and equipment to the performance of SCM by analysing the flexibility of shipment and logistic cost. Deployment of questioners was conducted to 200 owners of keripik tempe industries. Data was analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The result indicated that owners of keripik tempe industries should give attention to material supply to achieve best performance of business and SCM. Increacement of material supply can be solved through good relationship between supplier and involved in business cooperation.
References
Ab Rahman, M, N, Ismail, A, R, Dero, B, Md Rosli, M, E. 2008. Barriers to SCM Implementing. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 31(2): 719- 724
Ali, S, M, Rahman, Md, H, Tumpa, T, J, Rifat, A, Al, M, Paul, S, K. 2018. Examining price and service competition among retailers in a supply chain under potential demand disruption. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 40:40-47
Anatan, L. 2010. Pengaruh implementasi praktik-praktik manajemen rantai pasokan terhadap kinerja rantai pasok dan keunggulan kompetitif. Karisma 4(2):106-117
Aydin, A, Parker, R, P. 2018. Innovation and technology diffusion in competitive supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research. 265(3):1102-1114
Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Malang. 2016. Data UMKM. Dilihat 30 Desember 2016. <http://pelakuekonomi.malangkota.go.id/indexUmkm.php#cari>
Baglee, D, Trimble, R, MacIntyre, J. 2008. Maintenance strategy development within SME’s: The development of an integrated approach. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 41(3):1967--1976
Boulaksil, Y. 2016. Safety stock placement in supply chains with demand forecast updates. Operations Research Perspectives. 3:27-31
Chu, L, Simunic, D, A, Ye, M, Zhang, P. 2017. Transaction Costs and Competition among Audit Firms in Local Markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 64(1)
Craighead, C, W, Blackhurst, J, Rungtusanatham, M, J, Handfield, R, B. 2007. The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sciences. 38(1):131-156
Desphande, A, R. 2012. Supply chain management dimensions, supply chain performance and organizational performance: an integrated framework. International Journal of Business and Management. 7(8):1-18
Fattahi, M, Govindam, K, Keyvanshokooh, E. 2017. Responsive and resilient supply chain network design under operational and disruption risks with delivery lead-time sensitive customers. Trans-
portation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 101:176-200
Garas, A, Lapatinas, A. 2017. The role of consumer networks in firms’ multi-characteristics competition and market share inequality. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 43:76-86
Goutsos, S, Karacapilidis, N. 2004. Enhanced supply chain management for e-business transactions. International Journal of Production Economics. 89(2):141-152
Griffiths, J, James, R, Kempson, J. 2000. Focusing customer demand through manufacturing supply chains by the use of customer focused cells: An appraisal. International Journal of Production Economics. 65(1):111-120
Gunasekaran, A, Rai, B, K, Griffin, M. 2011. Resilience and competotoveness of small and medium size enterprises: an empirical research. International Journal of Production Research. 49(18):5489-5509
Gurnani, H, Mehrotra, A, Ray, S. 2012. Supply Chain Disruptions. Springer, London
Hapiz, T, M. 2012. Hubungan Tingkat Modal Sosial Terhadap Tingkat Pendapatan Pelaku UKM (Studi pada Sentra Industri Kripik Tempe Sanan Malang). Skripsi. Universitas Brawijaya. Malang
Jannah, R, Z, Subagja, H, Rujito, H. 2015. Optimalisasi kinerja rantai pasokan dan rantai nilai tembakau kasturi (Voor Oogst) di kabupaten jember. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian. 16(1):51-64
Johnson, M, E, Whang, S. 2002. E-business and supply chain management: an overview and framework. POMS. 11(4):413-423
Kementerian Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah. 2016. Perkembangan data usaha mikro, kecil, menengah (UMKM) dan usaha besar (UB). Dilihat 20 Juli 2017. <http://www.depkop.go.id/uploads/tx_rtgfiles/sandingan_data_umkm_2012-2013.pdf>
Kotabe, M, Kothari, T. 2016. Emerging market multinational companies’ evolutionary paths to building a competitive advantage from emerging markets to developed countries. Journal of World Business. 51(5):729-743
Kumar, R., Singh, R, K, Shankar, R. 2013. Study on coordination issues for flexibility in supply chain of SMEs: a case study. Global Journal of Flexible System Management. 14(2):81-92
Larrson, K. 2008. Optimization of the information flow in Material Shortage Management. Tesis. Federal Institute of Technology (ETH). Switzerland
Liu, C, L, Shang,, K, C, Lirn, T, C, Lai, K, H, Lun, Y, H, V. 2017. Supply chain resilience, firm performance, and management policies in the liner shipping industry. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Malik, S, N, A, A, Musa, H, Ahmad, S, Mohamad, N. 2014. The factors influencing supply chain distruptions on supply chain perform. Journal of Technology Management and Technopreneurship. 2(2):1-7
Mariana, R, R. 2009. Pengaruh diferensiasi produk kripik tempe terhadap loyalitas konsumen. Media Pendidikan, gizi, dan Kuliner. 1(1):1-13
Sekaran, U, Bougie, RJ. 2016. Research Methods for Business, A Skill Building Approach. John Willey & Sons
Slamet, Al Idrus, S. 2010. Penerapan e-commerse Sebagai Upaya Pengembangan Usaha Kecil Menengah yang Berdaya Saing Global. Disertasi. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim. Malang
Solimun. 2011. Analisis Multivariat: Pemodelan Struktural Partial Least Square–PLS. Citra Malang Press, Malang
Stefanovića, I, Milošević, D, Miletića, S. 2009. Significance and development problems of SMEs in contemporary market economy. Serbian Journal of Management. 4(1):127-136
Tambunan, T. 2008 Development of SME in ASEAN with reference to indonesia and thailand. Chulalongkorn Journal of Economics. 20(1):53-83
Traidcraft. 2008. Rebalancing the supply chain: buyer power, commodities and competition policy. Dilihat 20 Juli 2017. <http://unctad.org/Sections/ditc_ccpb/docs/ditc_ccpb0009_en.pdf>
Vaaland, T, I, Heide, M. 2007. Can the SME survive the supply chain challenges?. Supply Chain Management an International Journal. 12(1): 20-31
van der Vaart, T, Van Donk, D, P. 2008. A critical review of survey based research in supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics. 111(1):42-55
Wieteska, G. 2015. Environmental uncertainty accompanying purchases in the B2B market. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 213:911-917
Zhang, M, Tse, Y, K, Doherty, B, Li, S, Akhtar, P. 2018. Sustainable supply chain management: Confirmation of a higher-order model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 128:206-221
Zondag, M, M, Mueller, E, F, Ferrin, B, G. 2017. The application of value nets in food supply chains: a multiple case study. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 33(4):199-212
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal
